The immoral silence of the left

Why is it that people on the left like John Pilger grasp the fact that we live in times in which our civil liberties are being legislated out of existence, yet remain silent about the intensifying attacks on Holocaust revisionists?

Clearly, the war against Holocaust revisionism is a closely-related phenomenon. The same people behind the project for a global slave state are exactly the same people calling everywhere for anti-'hate' (sic) laws and for laws against 'denying' (sic) the so-called Holocaust. Those organs that co-ordinate world government, the EU and the UN, are also the vehicles for the latest pushes to criminalise revisionism, while the same mass media that helps to orchestrate panic over terrorism (and panics over Muslims) is the same mass media that howled like a stuck pig when the Holocaust conference was held in Teheran recently.

It seems to me that the attacks on leading revisionists like German Rudolf constitute a form of intellectual terror whose obvious end result is to generate universal, slavish adherence to the Holocaust myth. The (false) allegations that revisionism fosters antisemitism and racism is the pretext for effectively abrogating the free speech rights that we are all supposed to enjoy under the United Nations charter of Human Rights. We now have in place a vast complex of organisations Jews use to monitor non-Jewish populations for telltale signs of antisemitism and racism. This infrastructure - which actually does a great deal more than simply 'monitor' - amounts to the creation of a permanent (and almost universally tolerated) inquisition within what are supposed to be free and democratic societies.

Since it's obvious that the attacks on Holocaust revisionism only serve to advance the NWO agenda, the question arises as to why the left isn't more worried about it. First of all, I would suggest that it discredits leftist allegations that we are descending into an era of 'fascism.' If the powerful movements of our time were fascists ones, then, given that Holocaust ideology concerns itself only with crimes allegedly committed by fascists, governments everywhere would be promoting Holocaust revisionism, not trying to stamp it out of existence. (Wherever we're headed, it's not towards fascism.) But the left is obviously not in a hurry to confront information that contradicts its leading idea.

Second, it's because the left is terrified of admitting that the Holocaust is not the vehicle for progressive social change we once thought it was. Back in the '70s educators like myself thought Holocaust education would help to reform human beings of their dreadful prejudices and create a peaceful, loving multicultural society. The reality, however, is that belief in the Holocaust is rather the religious-ideological basis of the coming global slave state.

Presumably, the left is under the illusion that, if the Holocaust were to be exposed as a hoax, it would trigger a massive resurgence of antisemitism and racism. One historian I have been in communication with - she works at a Canadian university - told me that she isn't worried about whether the Holocaust happened or not so much as about the effect the resulting exposure would have on society.

I strongly doubt that the laying to rest of Holocaust ideology would provoke pogroms or encourage governments to institute antisemitic legislation, as she seems to fear. Even if there were a revival of popular antisemitism, the fact is it is nobody's business to decide what people may or may not say. We need to stop being control freaks - believing that we can reform people of views we find unacceptable (after all, we all hate it when others try to do that to us). Living in democratic societies means maturing to the point that we accept that many people have views we don't like and we recognise that it's also their human right to articulate their views in whatever manner they choose.

Invitation

Check out the 30-part film 'One Third of the Holocaust.' In an interview with the London Times published on August 29, 2001, Holocaust propagandist Gitta Sereny acknowledged that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp:

'Why on earth have all these people who made Auschwitz into a sacred cow - why didn't they go and look at Treblinka which was an extermination camp? It was possible. There were survivors alive when all this started. Nobody did. It was an almost pathological concentration on this one place. A terrible place – but it was not an extermination camp.'
SOURCE: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters/gitta_sereny.htm

The extermination camps, Sereny claims, were places like Treblinka and Sobibor, the so-called Aktion Reinhard camps which, according to Raul Hilberg, were responsible for only about a third of the infamous six million figure. This film systematically destroys the myth that these camps were extermination camps. You can find the entire film here:

http://www.codoh.com/video/onethird.html